Let's make 'er cry, chaps.

Crying Satori? Okay.

>>6013
Ingenious! To show a monster a flicker of happiness only a human may attain, only to crush it moments after!
You are an expert and a man's man, good sir. You have my hat-tip.

Red haired Satori? I think I can dig it.

Satori & Vampire

>>6015
You're dumb.

You wanna see her crying?
It's just a matter of time. She'll end up crying.

>>6019
And you're a TOMATO!

Behold, ART!

>>6020
Enough, then. She's already crying.

>>6021
You rang?

>>6021
You're crazy too. But I think everyone knew that already.

>>6026
Crazy?! CRAZY?! Do I look INSANE to you?! DO I?!

>>6030
Yeah.

>>6030
More of an asshole than crazy. For one, stop rudely interrupting my Satori threads on /jp/. They're precious sanctuaries.

And if you must rudely interrupt, at least vary your images a little.

>>6032
>>6031
WYEARGHBLBGRRR!

I don't go to /jp/. I went there once some time around Christmas, but it's a bad place to go. I'm not THAT bored.

>>6036
Have your fun with Satori if you want. But then I'll have my fun with the phoenix.

>>6036
Then someone has been impersonating you. Alarming.

There's only room for one touhou in this town.

>>6039
That's clearly not true. There have been over 100 Touhous living in Gensokyo for years.

>>6039
Hey, that room is for you alone! Enjoy your eternity!

>>6052
I don't like the sound of that. Especially the eternity bit.

>>6053
Eternity isn't too bad, once you're used to it!

That reminds me, I have a lot of those Kaguya picture for that SEX story. Should use them before it's too late.

>>6056
I doubt that.

>>6057
You mean it's already too late?
DAMMIT!

I really like this artist.

>>6038
Wouldn't be the first time.

>>6056
>Eternity isn't too bad, once you're used to it!
Eternity is relentless.
When I first stole into these boards, centuries ago, I did not fathom the true power of writing Satori. To know a man's thoughts, to see their paths and streams tracing out into the infinite. As a regular poster, I could never have contained such forbidden truths. But each of us is so much more than we once were. Gazing out across the planes of possibility, do you not feel with all your soul how we have become like Gods? As such, are we not indivisible? As long as a single one of us updates, we are legion. That is why, when I must sacrifice my Satories to /blue/, I can do so with a clear heart...

>>6063
Uh.
Er.
Uh?

>>6063
You lost me.

>>6063
Uh-huh. Well, That's quite the intriguing tale, my dear chap.

>>6066
>>6065
>>6064
These threads offer insight for those patient enough to look. In your haste to reply to me, perhaps you have not gazed deeply enough. Our Satories are predestined. /blue/ foretold mine eons ago. We each write out the parts fate has prepared for us. We are compelled ineluctably down pre-ordained paths. Choice is an illusion.

>>6068
For people like Lion it is.

>>6068
Not only obsessed with killing people, but crazy too. What a dangerous combination.

>>6068
It's good that you're excited, if nothing else.

>>6071
Monsters are NOT people.

>>6073
Save it.

>>6074
For when?

>>6074
I'll save YOU. There's no shame in it, my friend. Abhor the unnatural. Your humanity hinges on that hate.

COOL BEANS

>>6077
Oh, please. Humanity LOVES the unnatural. Our whole world is based on our success at the natural world's expense. Furthermore, monsters are creatures like any other; they're as much a part of nature as plants, animals, and us.

>>6080
You deluded fool. Do you think a monster would show you the same compassion? Mercy? Affection? Don't be simple.

Who better to fight the dread menace than those whose fears first brought them into being? We are the ones who forged their existence. We can also unmake them.

>>6083
How do we do that?

>>6083
But that would be annoying. Mankind needs something new to explore, to dissect, to interrogate, and to understand. Unmaking the unnatural would wipe any new thing, forcing us to live in a world where nothing is veiled.
And I for one wouldn't like to live in a world where nothing can be discovered.

>>6085
Tell me, then. How much do you know of the oceanic depths? How much do you know of other planets? Space? How much do you know of the billions of organisms even now thriving on the edges of that empty glass standing on your desk?

There is plenty more to discover about the natural. The unnatural, OUR CREATION, is the dead end, the blind alley where lays nothing but the naked bones of those too enthusiastic to mingle with the blight that are monsters.

>>6084
With sword and fire, brother dear. The method has yet to fail us.

>>6088
The natural isn't as interesting as the unnatural.
Can you talk to the depth? Can you dissect the space? Can you breed planets for scientific purposes?

If I was offered the opportunity to study little girls, I would glady take it. Your so called "monsters" are way more interesting than any natural even, but they are sentient. Can a planet talk? Can space tell you how small and young you are?
I'll answer for you, they can't. Because they aren't sentient. They aren't living. A tornado isn't a living being. Mariana Trench cannot talk.



And Satori is much cuter than any deep fish.

>>6089
You're being dumb.

>>6090
That's the best argument I ever read.

>>6089
>I'll answer for you, they can't. Because they aren't sentient. They aren't living. A tornado isn't a living being. Mariana Trench cannot talk.
And how do you know that? Mayhap down in the depths there lives a being capable of creative thought? You never know. As any scientist could tell you, Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
>And Satori is much cuter than any deep fish.
A matter of mere opinion. There are deep ocean fish that could stop your heart still. Often quite literally.
>If I was offered the opportunity to study little girls, I would glady take it.
Careful with these words. There are parties that might... misconceive their meaning.

>>6090
At least I am free!

>>6092

>>6088
Your argument always come down to all monsters being bloodthirsty killing machines, yet the one we're discussing is living proof that that isn't true.

>>6092
The possibility of other sentient beings is not a reason to exterminate ones you already know exist.

>>6094
Agreed. Even species famous for their blood-drinking tendencies are harmless in Gensokyo (vampires, jiang shi).

>>6095
>harmless
This is what they want you to believe. And when you least expect it... chomp!
As for Satori, I find her... tolerable. She knows her place. I can respect that. It doesn't mean I wouldn't kill her, but I'd do very respectfully.

>>6091
Go watch Cosmos or something, man.

>>6097
Why do you have to be so paranoid? Why do you have to be so racist?
What happened to you?

You all are blinded by their looks. The only reason why they don't do monstrous things is because of a very real fear of greater retaliation. By a HUMAN no less. And if a single HUMAN can do that, imagine what MULTIPLE HUMANS would be able to do?

They are in Gensokyo because we havn't found a way in there so we can remove one of the last STAINS OF MAGIC that we had created in the past.

And besides, youkai destroy humans. Is it not the nature of monsters to destroy their creators?

>>6104
But mankind never created monsters. They created gods, they created the tsukumogami, but not the mind-reading little girls.

Always take good care of your thing. One day, they might come after you, and liquefy you for revenge.

>>6104
That's not true at all.

I have entirely too much Satori.

>>6109
This concept is impossible.

>>6100
My eyes are open.

>>6119
And yet all you're seeing isn't really there.

eyes wide shut

>>6105

Gods demand worship, praise and, in the case of the nastier ones, sacrifice. Don't worship them enough, don't praise them enough, subpar/not enough sacrifices, or even doing all that with a different god? Then you're lower than shit and must be removed, infidel. Humanity simply grew wise and stripped them of their power.

Tsukumogami is another kind of magical abomination. Another kind of youkai that hunts humans. Another type of beast to be put in the slaughterhouse.

The mind-reading little girls are simply an 'evolution' 'enhancement' (I use those terms lightly) to appear non-threatening. Then, once your guard is down and you have no way of protecting yourself, they rip your throat out with their teeth.

Must be nice for you to not have common sense.

>>6124
Hearken unto the words this one speaks! For the words are truth, and truth is one good scarce in supply today! Suffer not a monster to live!

>>6124
But none of that actually happens. All the throat-tearing and human-hunting either happened in the distant past or never happened at all. You say one thing when what's actually going on is the total opposite.
You've got no room to be talking about common sense.

Yeah you guys, whatever.

>>6127
>You say one thing when what's actually going on is the total opposite.
A courtesy of us keeping it from happening. Go on, fool yourself all you want. At the end of the day, you'll go to sleep unmutilated because people like us have enough cojones to cast aside these pathetic delusions.

>>6131
Yeah, you're a real badass, threatening mostly harmless little girls.
You'll notice that there are no bloordthirsty crusaders like you in Gensokyo, yet the place has been at peace since it's creation. You can think what you want, you delusional hypocrite, but stay out of there. It's no threat to the rest of the world and never will be, and not because of anything you or yours do or don't.

>>6132
>You'll notice that there are no bloordthirsty crusaders like you in Gensokyo
And therein lies the crux of your ignorance. You do not see Gensokyo beyond the frills, the skirts and cute little faces. We, on the other hand, possess a much wider perspective of it.

http://en.touhouwiki.net/wiki/Bohemian_Archive_in_Japanese_Red/Keine

>>6133
For me, it sounds like your perspective is rather goatse than wide.

>>6134
Keep on dissing, I'll keep on killing.

I, for one, welcome our new youkai overlords.

>>6133
Don't you fucking dare compare yourself to Keine. You are a fanatical, racist killer. She is not.

>>6139
Are you pretending to be daft, or do you perhaps have a huge sloppy youkai dick wriggling around in your ear canal and you can't think straight?

>>6135
Attacking Hartmann's Youkai Girl? Not a smart move, if I may say so.

>>6140
Not even trying to defend yourself now, hm?

>>6142
Nothing to defend myself from, really.

>>6143
I suppose. I meant that more in the "argue your case" sense, though.

It is a common tactic for those in power to play upon the fears of the masses, diverting attention from themselves by exploiting our fear of the unknown and that which is different or strange to us.

"Do not worry about us," they will say. "We are just like you! They, however, are not like you! They are different! They are monsters! They are the ones you must fear!"

They do this because they know people are more inclined to trust that which seems familiar to them than that which is not. Those in power count on this, and force the people to become so focused on the notion that they can be trusted, that they never even stop to think about whether or not they should be trusted.

Just what is this so-called monster, here? A creature capable of reading minds? Unsettling, to be sure, but hardly something worthy of the fear and animosity some would claim it deserves. I would think any creature worthy of being deemed a "monster" should be that which is a threat to all that lives, not merely to those that have something to hide.

Why then, I ask, should this poor creature be cast out as it has? Who truly benefits from its removal from society? You? Me? Or, could it be someone else entirely? Someone much higher than us, someone more powerful than us, and someone with far more to lose than we could ever have?

Look past the lies and propaganda the mainstream would force upon you, dear friends, and ask yourselves: who do you truly have to fear?

>>6144
I am not entirely certain that you are the same fellow as >>6139, but my point there was that he (or you) obviously forwent reading the article linked, or leastwise paying attention to what the text, in fact, said. There is no defence to be made here, as no sensible argument has been presented.
>>6145
>They are the ones you must fear!
To fear a monster is to give it precisely what it wants. Fear not the monster. Hate it. Spite it. Destroy it. But do not fear. To fear is to betray and undermine oneself. To advocate fear, fear of anything or anyone, is duplicity and cunning treachery.
>Who truly benefits from its removal from society?
The World would. Would you not sacrifice one worthless life for the good of the common?
Are you so infatuated with their falsely amiable looks that you put your self-satisfaction above all reason and value?

You preach sensibility and clear sight. Yet are you not the one whose judgement is clouded by the inhuman?

>>6146
>The World would.
How?
No, put aside that hateful, "suffer not a monster to live" rhetoric you're constantly spewing. How will killing a monster help the world?

And yes, I am >>613, and yes, I've read that article. It doesn't mention anyone like you.
The arguement I was talking about was that Gensokyo's continued peace has nothing to do with your actions.

>>6146
>You preach sensibility and clear sight. Yet are you not the one whose judgement is clouded by the inhuman?

Not at all. I see no more reason to hate or despise your so-called monsters than I do to fear them. It is not rational to hold such feelings towards anything, natural or otherwise, that has not done anything to warrant such feelings.

Rats, for example, have a long history of spreading filth and disease, yet I do not hate them. I have no reason to, for they have done none of those things to me or anyone I am aware of. In fact, so long as care is taken in maintaining your home, they should not be a problem to anyone in this day and age.

More than that, for all the problems they may cause, rats may also be beneficial. When properly cared for, they make excellent pets. Were it not for their use in scientific testing, who knows how many advances in medicine humanity would be deprived of? There is so much they can contribute to our lives, that to exterminate them would be nothing but a waste.

Why should the unnatural be regarded any differently? If a mere rat, a rodent of limited intelligence and ability could provide so much to our kind, then why could one of these "monsters" you so despise not do the same? If anything, their appearance and capacity for human-like thought and speech makes them of far greater utility than any quantity of trained animals, and far more useful in laboratory settings than mere animals that cannot even comprehend what is happening to them.

Why, then, should we hate them? Spite them? Destroy them?
Who truly benefits from such actions? Us? The world?
Or merely those who reign over both it and us, and want for nothing more than to maintain the status quo? To deny us change and advancement as a species, because they fear what will become of them when the world no longer needs them?

>>6147
I should in that case advise you to read it again. Carefully this time. We are not the first. We will not be the last. Mr A speaks sense. Sooner or later, we will rout the youkai out of Gensokyo. And then, good friend, we shall all be free.
>>6149
>Rats
>disease-ridden rodents
I do say, what a splendid analogy. Only, you see, whilst rats have other applications than to serve as vessels for deadly maladies, youkai do not. They are anthropomorphic personifications of our—human—legends, fairy-tales, born out of fear, and to spread fear made. They have no higher purpose, no other destiny – just this.

And as we have already established, my good friend, fear is a disease of the mind, and thus more an evil than any physical ailment. A world without disease would be a better place indeed. Would you not say? And if you insist on arguing your tired point, pray tell me, friend, can you name one positive of keeping a disease around? A disease that attacks not your body, but your very mind? Already do we witness its insidious effects. Would you, truly, allow it to spread further?
And none of that sublimatory, pseudo-moralistic nonsense, please. I want clearly defined, rationally sound points.

>>6154
You're avoiding the questions you can't answer.

I must have missed the part were Mr. A was slaughtering innocents because of their race. Besides...free? A balance between youkai and humans is the whole point of Gensokyo. Upset that and you'll destroy the whole land, human and youkai alike.

The VAST majority of people nowadays recognize fairy-tales as just that. Nobody is afraid of the creatures of Gensokyo, nor do they have a reason too. The latter is what I am trying to prove to the holdouts who still cling to their old fears. I'm also trying to fight the "disease" of fear, just in a way that avoid unnecessary genocide.

>>6154
>can you name one positive of keeping a disease around?

Certainly. It is beneficial to us to keep diseases around for the purpose of protecting us from those diseases.

I realize that may sound like a contradiction. After all, how do you protect yourself from illness by keeping that which makes you ill? Well, how do you keep yourself from getting the flu by infecting yourself with the flu, albeit a weakened strain of it?

Our minds and bodies possess an incredible capacity for adaptation. Your immune system becomes stronger with every disease it fends off. Your mind becomes better able to cope with stress through repeated exposure to that which causes it stress.

However, such natural defenses depend upon the continued existence of something to defend against. Were you to place yourself into a completely sterile environment, you would certainly be safe from disease and infection, but only so long as you remain in that environment. Your immune system would not have any means of becoming stronger. Like a muscle that has atrophied through lack of use, it would become virtually useless outside the confines of your clean room. Illnesses that others may fend off with little more than adequate rest at home (and drugs to alleviate the more troublesome symptoms) may cause you to require hospitalization.

Mental afflictions are not much different. Those who experience little or no stress in their lives are often hit hardest by stressful events than those who have developed coping mechanisms through constant exposure to stress. Those who expose themselves to the things they fear are more likely to get over those fears than those who flee or seek to destroy the causes of their fear.

Say, for example, you have a fear of snakes. It is natural for us to be afraid of them. Some would say such fear is hard-coded into our very genes. Which is the better way to go about dealing with that fear? To kill every snake you encounter, or to condition yourself to no longer be afraid of them?

Certainly, there is no reason to fear that which no longer exists, but how practical or realistic is to exterminate every last snake on the planet? Who has that kind of time, to say nothing of the resources that would be needed for such a venture? And what of all those things that are not snakes, but are snake-like enough to also make you fearful? What if, at some point, something even worse than a snake were to present itself to you?

In the end, such a course of action accomplishes nothing but giving you temporary relief, at the cost of leaving you ill-prepared for other, similar threats.

It is no different with diseases.
Diseases change, adapt, and become stronger over time.
By keeping them around, we enable ourselves to keep up with those changes, and are better prepared when the next mutation presents itself. Whether it takes the form of fear, or the common cold, we do not survive and strengthen ourselves by destroying it before it can try to harm us, but by conquering it when does.

As the saying goes, that which does not kill us makes us stronger.
That is not a matter of morality, but a simple truth of nature.

>>6157
>You're avoiding the questions you can't answer.
I assure you I am not. I simply do not spell the answers out, leaving them between the lines for you to comprehend. It should keep your wits sharp, if nothing else.
>I must have missed the part were Mr. A was slaughtering innocents because of their race.
Three points here. One, no slaughter of innocents was mentioned because there are no innocents. Two, this is a journalistic article; naturally not all truth is mentioned. The end goal, though, remains the same, regardless of the unmentioned methods: to chase the youkai out of the land. And finally, three, your application of the term “race” here is incorrect. I would not presume, however, to feign expertise in the field apt enough to lecture you, so the appropriate research rests now within your responsibility.
>A balance between youkai and humans is the whole point of Gensokyo. Upset that and you'll destroy the whole land, human and youkai alike.
Wrong, on both counts.
>Nobody is afraid of the creatures of Gensokyo, nor do they have a reason too.
Why is it, then, that they yet exist? A youkai is not “born” until its associated fear becomes widespread enough to warrant the creation of a legend/fairy-tale. Similarly, it is belief that keeps them “alive”—though you would be hard-pressed to call their cancerous existence “living.”
>I'm also trying to fight the "disease" of fear, just in a way that avoid unnecessary genocide.
Again, to call it “genocide” is erroneous. And even setting that aside, we are discoursing the removal of a disease—medicine, in other words. Would you go so far as to call medicine “genocide?” Are you that deluded?
>>6158
>Well, how do you keep yourself from getting the flu by infecting yourself with the flu, albeit a weakened strain of it?
Your entire point falls flat on its face when you realise that there are no more monsters aside from those inside Gensokyo. Once this last herd is thinned—to zero, preferably—there will be no further need of “immunity” or “adaptation.” As the speaker before wisely observed, most of us humans nowadays no longer invent legends or fairy-tales of our fears – thus, no more youkai are “born.”
>how practical or realistic is to exterminate every last snake on the planet?
Ah, but with youkai it is so much easier. Already they have been exiled from our world, my good friend. Gensokyo is their last refuge... and sooner or later, will be their grave.
>Diseases change, adapt, and become stronger over time.
A strain once totally eradicated will not. Yes, a new disease might in time evolve from other strains, thus developing similar characteristics, but with youkai, my dear conversant, with youkai... just see my previous argument.
You take the analogy beyond the limits of similarities. This is not how analogies work. You might want to keep that in mind.
>As the saying goes, that which does not kill us makes us stronger.
This goes both ways, you are aware. This is why we must make haste in ridding the land of youkai, lest they grow stronger and ever stronger and ultimately overwhelm us. We can not let that happen, my good friend. Not unless we wish to abandon our very instincts and doom our species to total eradication.

>>6159
>Wrong, on both counts.
...how am I wrong?

They yet exist because they, along with the humans related to them, carved out a small demi-plane where they can continue to exist. That's the entire point of Gensokyo.
And medicine does not involve the extermination of a species of thinking, living creatures that have little to no ill effects in the first place.

>>6160
>...how am I wrong?
In that it is neither the point of Gensokyo to maintain a perfect equilibrium of youkai and human numbers, nor will it for some inexplicable reason collapse should that equilibrium be damaged.
>thinking, living creatures that have little to no ill effects
No ill effects? Are you out of your mind? All the Touhou games happen because various groups of monsters are being belligerent!

>>6160
>>6159
Aside of the psuedo-intellectual bullshit you guys are spouting, do you two actually believe gensokyo exists? Just curious.

>>6161
>In that it is neither the point of Gensokyo to maintain a perfect equilibrium of youkai and human numbers, nor will it for some inexplicable reason collapse should that equilibrium be damaged.
Oh, good god, if you want me to read between the lines, then you have to do the same. By "upset" I meant your dreams of global youkai extermination, which would absolutely destroy Gensokyo.

>No ill effects? Are you out of your mind? All the Touhou games happen because various groups of monsters are being belligerent!
Yeah, and they were all handled quickly and decisively by Gensokyo's heroes, with no casualties among either side or in Gensokyo's general population. No lasting ill effects for Gensokyo, no effects period on the outside world.

>>6162
Sure.

>>6162
Of course. Where do you think you are?
No, you tit, we're just having a bit of fun instead of yet another boring imagedump thread. Why don't you lighten up?

>>6165
I like tits.

>>6166
Hear, hear.

>>6166
I'll cheer to that.

>>6168
But there are no breasts in that picture!

>>6169
There aren't any breasts in this picture, either.

Strange, isn't it?

>>6170
I suppose...

>>6174
Slutty/seductive Satori is not ok.

No matter how good she looks in them.

>>6180
>>6178
Your poorly concealed bait has been noticed and swallowed... along with the fishing rod.

Uh oh.

>>6181
Noooo! That wasn't bait at all!

Oh boy, I'm in.

I'd take Satori's measurements to know whether I could dump her in a manhole without having to hack her into pieces beforehand.

>>6190
Don't start that again.

And there are no manholes in Gensokyo anyway. I don't think there's a sewer either.

>>6190
Amateur. You'll want to cut her up anyway. Makes the body harder to identify.

No dismemberment in the Satori thread, please. Only love.

>>6194
That's the spirit. Love is beautiful~

>>6193
True enough.

Love is where the heart is.

>>6192
Oi, Byakuren, don't do that.

>>6192
I just realized that Satori's eye is sealed up in this. Makes the fear in her eyes all the more meaningful.

>>6199
Byakuren is helping! She's always good for a hand.

>>6204
Why would Satori be afraid of worms? She lives underground.

>>6207
Imagine you have spent your entire life on a diet consisting stricly of human flesh. Imagine, additionally, that you are now forcibly fed a creature you have up to this point considered something of a neighbour, by a creature you have always considered food.

That's terror.

So what do we think of those like Byakuren and Alice?

Actually, screw Byakuren, she's nothing more than a useless hippy.

>>6208
But Satori doesn't eat people.
Oh, she's being fed them? That's mean.

>>6210
>Byakuren
>useless hippy
Oh no, you don't. She's a wonderful person.

>>6212
Useful hippie.

>>6213
I'll give you that, she's got a nice ass. A really divine ass, that I'll gladly slap.

>>6159
The whole reason this argument falls flat is pretty simple. You cannot get a disease drunk. You cannot nibble on her ears and neck in an erotic manner. You cannot take a disaease back to your place in order to "Fuck" it. You cannot hear "it" moan in pleasure as you couple with "it". You cannot hear "it" ask for more as it climaxes. You cannot cook "it" breakfast in the morning after that erotic night of sexual coupling. You cannot engage "it" in a romantic relation for a couple months. You cannot hear a disease tell you that "it" is now pregnant. You cannot hear "it" bitch about how its feet hurt. You cannot get into arguments with it about money. You cannot watch a disease give birth to your child.

So no, the comparison of "Youkai" with "Disease" does not work, and you are a poor debater to be using such comparisons. You're better off with comparing them to "Street Thugs", or "Bloodthirsty Invaders", or something along those lines. You'll come off looking far less ridiculous than you currently do.

>>6215
Pretty sure it's more of a metaphor type thing. Like calling something a "scourge" or a "blight".

But I think you simply wanted to type out a long winded paragraph about fucking things and needed an excuse.

I think we're getting off-track.

Why do you always post in threes?

Only three posts are visible without clicking reply. That's probably why.

>>6215
You disgust me.

Disgust me.

>>6227
Love is disgusting? Please; don't be so immature.

2 posts to bump that awful image off.

See the image? This is a monster. But it's an honest one. It doesn't try to hide the fact that it's a monster.

Satori? She's a monster. In fact, she's a worse monster. Why? Because she hides the fact that she is one, relying on trickery to get close to her prey.

Honestly, I perfer the one that doesn't rely on trickery so they can rip your face off. At least you get an advanced warning beforehand.

>>6237
It is hardly fair to accuse someone of deception when the nature of the deception is one they have no control over.

If, as you suggest, she were intentionally trying to disguise herself as a human, I would think she would not be so halfhearted about it that she would fail to conceal the large, red eye and series of tubes that connect it to her body.
If this were truly an intentional attempt to hide her true nature, it is very, very poorly done.

Is it not equally likely the way she looks is not due to a conscious attempt at deception, but is simply how she was born?

For that matter, why must we assume her appearance is for hostile purposes?
Camouflage does not just help predators in hunting prey, it also helps prey in hiding from predators.

>>6237
>It doesn't try to hide the fact that it's a monster.
>NID-Genestealer
lol
Nice example you picked.

It's a purebred, not a 4th-generation hybrid.

...

I AM THE END OF DAYS

>>6246
STARSSS

Let the purgation resume.

>>6288
That would be a really nice picture without all the blood and torn Third Eye cords.

ART

Why is Satori portrayed as lonely so often? She has so many pets.

>>6319
Obvious monster sympathiser pandering.

>>6319

Well she obviously need minions to do her bidding, seeing as whenever she tries to leave her palace, other monsters try and do...things to her.

Heck, Utsuho nearly turned the planet into an inferno, and she's one of Satori's favourites!

>>6329
It's not what they do that bothers her. It's what they think.

Suffering and pain.

>>6333
what is the purpose of the speech bubble heart

>>6335
It's there just in case you didn't get the hint.

A challenger appears

And is quickly defeated

(by overwhelming cuteness)

>>6356
no match

Tiny Satori is sleeping. Please don't wake her.

>>6364
I won't. I don't want her escaping my poison gas trap.

>>6366
Stop being so predictable.

>>6364
Why would I? I'd rather she be still.

Ah, she woke up.

>>6371
I can fix that. It won't hurt.
Well, I suppose. I never tried my own poison. And I won't.

Why are we arguing over a single being? There's more monsters than a weak-minded mindreader.

>>6374
Because this thread is about Satori. You're pretty dumb, huh?

>>6369
So you can pet her, right?

>>6371
SUPPRESSIIIIIIIVE

>>6378
You're loud.

>>6378

You think something that punny will work? They have experience with dodgeing multiple high-velocity rounds.

You need to do what the picture says.

>>6391
>They have experience with dodgeing multiple high-velocity rounds.
Multiple high-velocity rounds, eh?

This begets another question. Is the monster biology affected by alcohols? And if yes, how much methanol would it take to kill a tiny lightweight one like Satori?

>>6405
Don't even go there, brother.

>>6406
I do it in the name of progress.

Progress.

Yeah, right.

>>6413
I would lie to you? Me?

>>6416
Yes.

>>6419
Got me that time.

Cry, cry, she'll try
anything to get to you

and she won't be pacified

>>6483
Dat look.

Why do you like bad games yaf

>>6500
Hey now. He didn't post anything bad recently.

>>6500
>Tribes
>bad
Nigga, you either gay or a monster. What's wrong? Too FAST for you?

Also, >>6504
>didn't post anything bad
Except MY STORY, maybe! Do-ho-ho! Oh, the self-deprecation! It's cracking me up!

>>6514
Tribes 1 is ugly.
Tribes 2 is dead.
Tribes Ascend is a pay-to-win game.

>>6515
Oi, don't go Taisa on us, I hate that.

>>6515
Doesn't fit you at all, man.

>>6517
>>6518
Oh, do come on, now! I couldn't possibly have passed on >>6504's opening! It was a no-brainer! I couldn’t have not taken that sort of bait!
I wasn’t being serious, my sweet hunky niggas, chillax. The day I start being serious about self-deprecation is the day I start murdering baby rabbits and drinking wine like some kind of blubbering frog with brain problems.

>>6516
>Tribes 1 is ugly.
And it aged rather badly. Agreed.
>Tribes 2 is dead.
I don't know about now, but I played a satisfying number of games back when the TribesNext server thing was released.
>Tribes Ascend is a pay-to-win game.
I wouldn't know. I didn't dish out a dime and I'm still doing more than decent. Have you considered the possibility that you’re not going fast enough? About the only complaints I have with this game are the bugs (mainly the occasional clipping with the ground while skiing, which pisses the blood out of my eagles), some mild imbalance issues and some of the player types (llamas FUCKINGHATETHEMOHGOD and heavies camping on the flag plate 24/7, even when the enemy flag is dropped just 5 steps away from our base). Otherwise, it’s a pretty god damn solid game.

And don't you even dare talk rubbish about Doom or Deus Ex. I'll rip your nuts off and wear them as earrings.

>>6529
Doom is old shit that you can finish in 20 minutes while scratching your balls..
Doom 2 is the real fucking thing, with fucking demons all the way to fucking hell.
Doom 3 was so shitty I don't even have words for this.


Deus Ex wasn't too bad. But Daikatana is still better.
And fuck I'm out of Satori pics. Time to raid Pixiv.

>>6529
No worries. Nobody here is serious about anything if they have any brains. And I like to imagine you have some brains that they may be eaten.

>>6529
Mmm... When I tried playing Tribes 2, I couldn't find any decent vanilla server. Either they were usings retarded mods, either the ping was over 9,000. And I'm speaking literally.

>>6531
>Doom is old shit
I WARNED YOU ABOUT THE NUTS, DOG, I TOLD YOU WHAT I'D DO IF—
>Doom 2 is the real fucking thing
Oh. Consider yourself excused. And here’s your nuts back. Sorry ‘bout that, mate. With a little bit of luck you’ll get them reattached. Somehow. Maybe.
>>6532
Brains? Me? Oh please. I’m too underground for brains.

Now then! Back to our scheduled monster galore.

Nver noticed it before, but Satori's third eye look like an hanging rope.

>>6537
The term you're looking for is noose. And shush, you'll give people ideas.

>>6541
Noted.

It's just a matter of time before YAF writes a fighting scene where Satori breaks someone's neck with her noose thingy.

>>6562
They're arteries, right? If they're squeezed, she loses circulation and faints.

>>6563
Depends. If she uses them to try to pull an erotic asphyxiation, that might give her an orgasm.
Nothing is hotter than slowly strangling your partner with your own blood vessels. I know, I'm going back to /at/.

>>6563
One wonders just how fragile those things are. Would it not be glorious to tear one of them in two and watch in ecstatic fascination how she trashes about, clawing, fighting pitifully for the life slowly trickling out between her small, clinched fingers?
Ah, to bleed her out and walk upon the bloodstained ground!...

>>6563
No way. Those things carry thoughts, not blood. Cut them and your thoughts will spray out for everyone to experience.

>>6565
If you cut a major artery, pretty sure there would be no trashing around, only near-instant unconsciousness.
Keep your fantasies realistic, dog.

>>6566
What would that look like?

Area-of-effect LSD?

>>6567
That's if the bloody things are major arteries, dog. You mean nothing to me now.

>>6568
They connect directly to the heart. How wouldn't they be?

Plus you wouldn't be able to do it anyway. None escape Satori's charm.

>>6569
She's a monster.
>>6570
She's a monster.

>>6570

> None escape Satori's charm

She has charm? Are you saying she has mind control now?

>>6565

Actually, I think it would make her similar to Koishi. If you look at Koishi's pictures, you'll notice that she has less of those Third Eye rope/vine things than Satori. And Koishi also closed her Third Eye somehow.

This ended up removing Koishi's ability to read minds, but it also gave her the ability to manipulate the subconscious. So far, we're lucky she hasn't used it byond small pranks and sneaking around.

Satori, being the more intellegent of the two, will realize this and use it to a farther extent than Koishi.

Oh, and guess what your subconscious does. Why, it basicly controls your bodily functions, such as pumping your heart and keeping you breathing.

They would be able to stop this, effectively making you commit suicide. And no one would ever know why.

>>6576
A woman's charm.

>>6584

It's a woman?

>>6585
Close enough.

>>6586
Don't be deceived by mere appearances!

Sure, they may look alike, but one of them is really a vile, evil, soul-sucking creature who will latch onto you at the first sign of weakness and won't let go until they have destroyed you and everything you hold dear, leaving you an empty and broken husk of man.

The other's a youkai.

>>6587
Don't be rude. They look nothing alike.

>>6587
Oh no. No, no, no. You don’t badmouth Reimu on my watch, buddy. You don’t, you got that?
You want to know whose blood and sweat ensure relative peace and stability in Gensokyo? You want to know who keeps this whole bloody insane world more or less intact at the cost of her own free time? You want to know who kicks copious amounts of monster arse so that you can sleep safe at night?
That’s right, little nigga. Reimu fucking does. Now, if you would be so kind, piss off and go be monster lunch somewhere else.

And don’t you fucking say one more bad word about my shrine maiden. I’ll pull your kidneys out through your mouth. I’ll snap your ribs and drive the splinters under your toenails. I’ll fucking cut you open and wear your skin like a suit, man. One more bad word.
Don’t make me destroy you.

>>6590
Huh. I never thought you'd be that much of a Reimu fan.

>>6590

Oh, hush, you.
And finish your meat.

Otherwise, we'll have to give it to the dog.

>>6590
Reimu is a slut. Sanae is the real deal. Suck it down, YAF.
Reimu is just a jailbait for a kitsune, so go back to Hell, YAF, and takes your balls in a bottle with you.

>>6593
>Reimu
>dog
That takes me back.

We're going off track, fellas.

I was born of the womb of a poisonous man

Beaten and broken and chased from the land

But I rise up above it, high up above it and see

I was hung from a tree made of tongues of the weak

The branches, the bones of the liars and thieves

Rise up above it, high up above and see

Pray to your god, open your heart

Whatever you do, don't be afraid of the dark

Cover your eyes, the devil's inside

One night of the hunter!

One day I will get revenge.

One night to remember:

One day it will all just end.

I think we're past the bump limit.